ISSN: 2332-2608

ఫిషరీస్ & పశువుల ఉత్పత్తి

అందరికి ప్రవేశం

మా గ్రూప్ ప్రతి సంవత్సరం USA, యూరప్ & ఆసియా అంతటా 3000+ గ్లోబల్ కాన్ఫరెన్స్ ఈవెంట్‌లను నిర్వహిస్తుంది మరియు 1000 కంటే ఎక్కువ సైంటిఫిక్ సొసైటీల మద్దతుతో 700+ ఓపెన్ యాక్సెస్ జర్నల్‌లను ప్రచురిస్తుంది , ఇందులో 50000 మంది ప్రముఖ వ్యక్తులు, ప్రఖ్యాత శాస్త్రవేత్తలు ఎడిటోరియల్ బోర్డ్ సభ్యులుగా ఉన్నారు.

ఎక్కువ మంది పాఠకులు మరియు అనులేఖనాలను పొందే ఓపెన్ యాక్సెస్ జర్నల్స్

700 జర్నల్స్ మరియు 15,000,000 రీడర్లు ప్రతి జర్నల్ 25,000+ రీడర్లను పొందుతున్నారు

ఇండెక్స్ చేయబడింది
  • ఇండెక్స్ కోపర్నికస్
  • గూగుల్ స్కాలర్
  • షెర్పా రోమియో
  • J గేట్ తెరవండి
  • అకడమిక్ కీలు
  • ఎలక్ట్రానిక్ జర్నల్స్ లైబ్రరీ
  • RefSeek
  • Directory of Research Journal Indexing (DRJI)
  • హమ్దార్డ్ విశ్వవిద్యాలయం
  • EBSCO AZ
  • OCLC- వరల్డ్ క్యాట్
  • విద్వాంసుడు
  • SWB ఆన్‌లైన్ కేటలాగ్
  • వర్చువల్ లైబ్రరీ ఆఫ్ బయాలజీ (విఫాబియో)
  • పబ్లోన్స్
  • యూరో పబ్
  • కార్డిఫ్ విశ్వవిద్యాలయం
ఈ పేజీని భాగస్వామ్యం చేయండి

నైరూప్య

Productive and Reproductive Performance of Indigenous Chickens in Sibu Sire District, Eastern Wollega Zone, Ethiopia

Chala Adugna

The study was conducted with objective of identifying indigenous chickens’ productive, reproductive performance and marketing system in Sibu sire districts of eastern wollega zone. Structured questionnaire were used for data collection. Stratified sampling method was used to stratify the study areas in to different agro ecological zones and random sampling methods were used to select representative peasant association. Respondents from each PA were selected using purposive sampling methods based on number of chickens owning, experience and availability of infrastructure. Both primary and secondary source of data were collected and analyzed using Spss 20. The mean flock size per household of the study area was 14.16 ± 1.29. About 34.79% of chickens were kept for egg production followed by cash income and chick production. 92% of respondent use scavenging feeding system and 8% only practice supplementation. Main supplementary feeds were maize and household leftover followed by wheat, sorghum and barley. About 52.8% of respondent provide supplementary feeding once and 39.1%, 7.9% provide twice and three times respectively. The main source of water was river and with free access watering practice. Most of the respondent (58.70%) use common house for chickens followed by separate and on floor housing system. About 63.8% collect egg every day, every two day (24.6%) and not collect (12%) respectively. About 72% of respondent use straw for egg storage. About 67.5% the respondent practice culling of unproductive chickens and the main reasons for culling was age. Color was the main selection criteria followed by hatchability and size in study area. Productive performance of chickens in the study area reveals that average number egg laid per clutch per hen was 12.52 ± 0.12 egg and with average clutch numbers of 3.34 ± 0.10. Number of egg hatched per clutch per hen was 12.10 ± 0.24 egg and average number egg hatched per hen per year was 27.81 ± 0.53. The mean hatchability performances of hen in study area were 72.09% with 26.71% mortality rate. All of respondent use hand egg collection methods using material like pot for egg collection. The main actors participating in marketing of chicks and egg were producers, middle men and consumers. 81.94% and 91.1% of respondents practice chickens and egg selling price fluctuation was the main challenges of marketing in study area.